薔薇之友 Rosenfans

標題: TM 2013-10-01 [打印本頁]

作者: Vonklee    時間: 1-10-2013 14:28
標題: TM 2013-10-01
今日12隻船,冇黎就真可惜....




作者: tomtso    時間: 1-10-2013 15:03
最右邊係Rodney?
作者: oldv1rr    時間: 1-10-2013 15:07
想當年,金戈鐵馬,氣吞萬里如虎。
看今天,鋰電無刷,水花激起似箭。

個幾位潜左水当年船友吾該浦頭
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20


作者: Vonklee    時間: 1-10-2013 15:34
3隻中國DD果張好正!
作者: cmpang    時間: 1-10-2013 19:45
Vonklee 發表於 1-10-2013 15:34
3隻中國DD果張好正!

可惜無跟遼寧合成編隊 ...
作者: paulsiu    時間: 1-10-2013 21:30
Thks Hon Ba, and all ... great day, but with the loss of 167 ...

作者: timli    時間: 1-10-2013 23:37
What a glorious way to die.....for a warship like this!  167 was vanished from sight in less than 3 seconds....undoubtedly an unprecendented history with no parallel to any other.  Perhaps just second to Hood in 1941.
作者: oldv1rr    時間: 7-10-2013 21:58
本帖最後由 oldv1rr 於 7-10-2013 22:03 編輯

再睇番原圖, 隻遼寧航向不同, 比我咳左. otherwise, the scales are in order 1:100, 1:150; 1:200 and 1:350

DSCN5744.JPG (448.28 KB, 下載次數: 76)

DSCN5744.JPG

作者: Vonklee    時間: 8-10-2013 07:06
oldv1rr 發表於 7-10-2013 21:58
再睇番原圖, 隻遼寧航向不同, 比我咳左. otherwise, the scales are in order 1:100, 1:150; 1:200 and 1:3 ...

這是最佳影法,越遠比例越細,睇落有深度感。感覺好好!

作者: cmpang    時間: 8-10-2013 09:13
下次你影果陣時先号召一下 ...
作者: david    時間: 8-10-2013 12:41
oldv1rr 發表於 7-10-2013 21:58
再睇番原圖, 隻遼寧航向不同, 比我咳左. otherwise, the scales are in order 1:100, 1:150; 1:200 and 1:3 ...

由大至細, 咁都俾你撞中捕捉到, 好嘢.
作者: david    時間: 8-10-2013 12:45
本帖最後由 david 於 8-10-2013 12:46 編輯

Vonklee, 點解我數極都係 11 隻嘅 ? 係咪重有一隻潛緊水未上嚟 ?  

作者: oldv1rr    時間: 8-10-2013 19:50
Yes,張老板隻深圳中導彈,3秒鐘內消失於水面上。
作者: Vonklee    時間: 8-10-2013 20:39
oldv1rr 發表於 8-10-2013 19:50
Yes,張老板隻深圳中導彈,3秒鐘內消失於水面上。

算係導彈定魚雷?

作者: oldv1rr    時間: 8-10-2013 21:51
漁雷一個特性是 submersible. 即係水下部分是 significant and noticeable. 佢厘味野係掠水面行,體形細小,易於隱藏於船群之中,橫衝直揰,不傀為十大癲雞之首。
作者: Harquebus    時間: 21-6-2014 12:07
What a glorious way to die.....for a warship like this!  167 was vanished from sight in less than 3 seconds....undoubtedly an unprecendented history with no parallel to any other.  Perhaps just second to Hood in 1941.


Another lost ship? I am late to reply but a sad loss friends, a sad loss but I agree; a glorious way to die. I have said in another thread on Rosenfans that it is prudent to add floatation material to the empty spaces inside the ship's hull to prevent sinking. I do not want to hear of these sinkings again.




歡迎光臨 薔薇之友 Rosenfans (http://rosenfans.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2